Schiebinger, L. Has Feminism Changed Science? (Harvard University Press, 1999).
Hubbard, R. Women Look at Biology Looking at Ladies (eds Hubbard, R., Henifin, M. S. & Fried, B. ) (G. K. Hall, 1979).
Tuana, N. The speculum of ignorance: the Women’s Health Movement and epistemologies of lack of knowledge. Hypatia 21 , 1–19 (2006).
Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Princeton University Press, 1981).
Richards, E. Darwin and the Making of Sexual Selection (University of Chicago Press, 2017).
Ah-King, M. The Female Turn – How Evolutionary Science Shifted Perceptions About Females (Palgrave Macmillan, in press).
Milam, E. L. Looking for a Few Good Males: Female Choice in Major Biology (John Hopkins College Press, 2010).
Hrdy, H. B. The Woman that Never Evolved (Harvard University or college Press, 1981).
Tang-Martínez, Z. Rethinking Bateman’s Principles: Challenging persistent myths of sexually reluctant females and promiscuous males. J. Sex. Res. 53 , 532–559 (2016).
Mills, C. W. The particular Racial Contract (Cornell College or university Press, 1997).
Proctor, R. N. & Schiebinger, T. (eds) Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (Stanford School Press, 2008).
Andersson, M. Sexual Choice (Princeton University Press, 1994).
McLennan, D. A. Changes in female colour across the ovulatory cycle in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Can. J. Zool. 72 , 144–153 (1994).
Odom, K. M., Hall, D. L., Riebel, K., Omland, K. Electronic. & Langmore, N. E. Female song is widespread and ancestral in song birds. Nat. Commun. 5 , 3379 (2014).
Eberhard, W. G. Sex Selection plus Animal Genitalia (Harvard College Press, 1985).
Ah-King, Meters., Barron, A. & Herberstein, M. Electronic. Genital evolution: Why are women still understudied? PLoS Biol. 12 , e1001851 (2014).
Galicia-Mendosa, I., Sánchez, V. & Cordero, C. On the function of signa, a genital trait of female Lepidoptera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101 , 786–793 (2009).
Sánchez, V., Hernández-Baños, B. E. & Cordero, C. The Evolution of a female genital trait widely distributed in the Lepidoptera: comparative evidence for an effect associated with sexual coevolution. PLoS One 6 , e22642 (2011).
Plakke, M., Deutsch, A., Meslin, C., Clark, N. & Morehouse, And. Dynamic digestive physiology of a female reproductive organ in a polyandrous butterfly. J. Exp. Biol. 218 , 1548–1555 (2015).
McKinney, F., Cheng, K. & Bruggers, D. J. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed Smith, R. D. ) (Academic Press Inc., 1984).
Birkhead, T. L. Sperm competition in birds. TREE 2 , 268–272 (1987).
Smith, T. M. Extra-pair copulations within Black-Capped Chickadees—the role of the female. Behaviour 107 , 15–23 (1988).
Lifjeld, J. T., Dunn, P. O. & Westneat, Deb. F. Lovemaking selection by sperm competitors in birds: Male-male competition or woman choice? L. Avian Biol. 25 , 244–250 (1994).
Stamps, J. Feminism and Evolutionary Biology, Boundaries, Intersections plus Frontiers (ed Gowaty, G. A. ) 294–319 (Chapman and Hall, 1997).
Burley, N. To. & Parker, P. G. (eds) Avian Reproductive Tactics: Female and Male Perspectives (The American Ornithologists’ Union, 1998).
Gray, E. M. Parker, L. G. & Burley, In. T. (eds) Avian Reproductive Tactics: Woman and Male Perspectives (The American Ornithologists’ Union, 1998).
Hann, H. W. Life history associated with the Oven-bird in southern Michigan. Wilson Bull. 49 , 145–237 (1937).
Parker, Gary the gadget guy. A. Semen competition plus its evolutionary consequences within the insects. Biol. Rev. 45 , 525–567 (1970).
Thornhill, Ur. Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Am. Nat. 110 , 529–548 (1976).
Thornhill, 3rd there’s r. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps . Am. Nat. 122 , 765–788 (1983).
Lloyd, J. Electronic. Mating conduct and natural selection. Fla. Entomol. 62 , 17–34 (1979).
Hrdy, S i9000. B. Male-male competition and infanticide among the langurs (Presbytis entellus) of Abu, Rajasthan. Folia Primatol. 22 , 19–58 (1974).
Hausfater, H. & Hrdy, S. B. Infanticide, Comparative and Major Perspectives (Aldine, 1984).
van Schaik, Chemical., & Janson, C. They would. (eds) Infanticide by Men and its Implications (Cambridge University Push, 1984).
Chek, A. The. & Robertson, R. T. Infanticide in female tree swallows: A role for sexual choice. Condor 93 , 454–457 (1991).
Sharp, Ersus. P. & Clutton-Brock, Capital t. H. Competition, breeding success and ageing rates in female meerkats. Jour. Evol. Biol. 24 , 1756–1762 (2011).
Nelson-Flower, M. J. et al. Costly reproductive competition between females in a monogamous cooperatively breeding bird. Proc. R. Soc. W 280 , 20130728 (2013).
Arnqvist, Grams. & Rowe, L. Intimate conflict plus arms races between the particular sexes: The morphological adaptation for control of mating in the female insect. Proc. L. Soc. M 261 , 123–127 (1995).
Rowe, M. & Day, T. Detecting sexual conflict and physically antagonistic coevolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. N. Biol. Sci. 361 , 277–285 (2006).
Karlsson Green, K. & Madjidian, M. A. Active males, reactive females: Stereotypic sex roles in sex conflict research. Anim. Behav. 81 , 901–907 (2011).
Zuk, M., Garcia-Gonzalez, F., Herberstein, M. E. & Simmons, L. Watts. Model systems, taxonomic bias, and lovemaking selection: Beyond Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 59 , 321–338 (2014).
Ryan, M. L. & Rand, S. Evoked vocal response in male tungara frogs: Preexisting biases in male responses. Anim. Behav. 56 , 1509–1516 (1998).
Basolo, A. L. & Delaney, E. J. Man biases with regard to male characteristics in females in Priapella olmecae and Xiphophorus helleri (Family Poeciliidae). Ethology 107 , 431–438 (2001).
Qvarnström, The. & Price, T. M. Maternal effects, paternal results and intimate selection. TREE 16 , 95–100 (2001).
Brown, Ur. E. The particular rodents. We. Social Odours in Mammals (eds Brown, R. E. & Macdonald, D. W. ) 245–344 (Clarendon, 1985).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. Sexual selection in females. Anim. Behav. 77 , 3–11 (2009).
Nelson, L. H. The field of biology and Feminism: A Philosophical Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species (Cosimo Incorporation., 2007).
Gowaty, P. A. Current Perspectives on Sex Selection: What’s Left after Darwin? (ed Hoquet, To. ) 103–118 (Springer, 2015).
Alonzo, S. H. & Servedio, M. R. Grey zones of sexual selection: Why is finding a modern definition so hard. Proc. R. Soc. B 286 , 20191325 (2019).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Huchard, E. Social competition and selection in males plus females. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368 , 20130074 (2013).
Hare, L. M. & Simmons, L. W. Lovemaking selection as well as evolutionary consequences in female animals. Biol. Rev. 94 , 929–956 (2019).
Clutton-Brock, T. They would. Sexual choice in males and females. Science 318 , 1882–1885 (2007).
Rosvall, K. The. Intrasexual competition in females: Evidence for sexual assortment? Behav. Ecol. 22 , 1131–1140 (2011).
Clutton-Brock Capital t. H. Mammalian Societies (Wiley & Sons, 2016).
Gowaty, P. A new. Feminism in addition to Evolutionary Biology, Boundaries, Intersections and Frontiers (ed Gowaty, P. Some sort of. ) 351–384 (Chapman & Hall, 1997).
Lawton, D. F., Garstka, W. Ur. & Hanks, J. C. Feminism and even Evolutionary The field of biology, Boundaries, Intersections and Frontiers (ed Gowaty, P. A good. ) 63–85 (Chapman & Hall, 1997).
Tang-Martínez, Z. & Ryder, T. W. The problem with paradigms: Bateman’s worldview as a case study. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 , 821–830 (2005).
Eberhard, Watts. G. Female Control: Intimate Selection by Cryptic Woman Choice (Princeton University Push, 1996).
Hrdy, S. M. Langurs associated with Abu: Women and Male Strategies regarding Reproduction (Harvard University Click, 1977).
Altmann, J. Feminism and Evolutionary Biology, Boundaries, Intersections together with Frontiers (ed Gowaty, P. A. ) 320–333 (Chapman & Hall, 1997).
Gowaty, P. Your. & Hubbell, S. G. Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: It’s about time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 , 10017–10024 (2009).
Fedigan, L. M. Feminism inside Twentieth-Century Science, Technology, and additionally Medicine (eds Creager, Some. N. L., Lunbeck, Electronic. & Schiebinger, L. ) (University involving Chicago Hit, 2001).
Tobias, J. A fabulous., Montgomerie, 3rd there’s r. & Lyon, B. At the. The evolution of woman ornaments not to mention weaponry: Sociable selection, sexual selection, and also ecological competitors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367 , 2274–2293 (2012).
West-Eberhard, Meters. J. Sex-related selection, social competition, as well as speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58 , 155–183 (1983).
West-Eberhard, M. J. Darwin’s forgotten idea: The social essence of sex selection. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 46 , 501–508 (2014).
Rivas, M. A. & Burghardt, G. M. The particular Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Viewpoints on Pet Cognition (eds Bekoff, Michael., Colin, An important. & Burghardt, G. Meters. ) 9–17 (MIT Media, 2002).
Asquith, P. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge (ed Laura N. ) 239–256 (Routledge, 1996).
Harding, S. Typically the Science Question in Feminism (Cornell University Press, 1986).
Haines, Chemical. D., Rose, E. E., Odom, K. J. & Omland, K. E. This role connected with diversity found in science: A case study of women advancing women birdsong research. Anim. Behav. 168 , 19–24 (2020).
Haraway, D. L. Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science (Routledge, 1989).
Longino, H. Elizabeth. Feminism plus Science (eds Keller, Age. F. & Longino, H. E. ) (Oxford College Press, 2006).
Keller, Y. F. Feminism and science. Signs 7 , 589–602 (1982).
Ogden, T. E. How gender bias has shaped reproductive biology. BioScience 71 , 216–222 (2021).
Orr, Big t. J. et al. It takes two to tango: Including a female perspective inside reproductive the field of biology. Integr. Comp. Biol. 60 , 796–813 (2020).
Ahnesjö, I. ainsi que al. Considering gender‑biased assumptions in. Evolut. Biol. Evol. Biol. 47 , 1–5 (2020).
Biology in addition to Gender Study Group. The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology. Hypatia 3 , 61–76 (1988).
Burghardt, G. Mirielle. et al. Perspectives—Minimizing observer bias in behavioral studies: A review and recommendations. Ethology 118 , 511–517 (2012).
Nature Editorial. In praise of replication studies. Character 578 , 489–490 (2020).